1.0Сайт журналу «Геоінформатика»http://www.geology.com.ua/enАдміністраторhttp://www.geology.com.ua/en/blog/author/andriy/rich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="aMz2sDpLop"><a href="http://www.geology.com.ua/en/4363-2/">(Українська) Geoinformatika 2015; 3(55) : 5-30</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="http://www.geology.com.ua/en/4363-2/embed/#?secret=aMz2sDpLop" width="600" height="338" title="“(Українська) Geoinformatika 2015; 3(55) : 5-30” — Сайт журналу «Геоінформатика»" data-secret="aMz2sDpLop" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript"> /* <![CDATA[ */ /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); //# sourceURL=http://www.geology.com.ua/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js /* ]]> */ </script> Geoinformatika 2015; 3(55) : 5-30 (in Russian) MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES OF DIRECT PROSPECTING FOR OIL AND GAS: FEASIBILITY OF THEIR ADDITIONAL APPLICATION IN SELECTING SITES OF WELL DRILLING S.P. Levashov1,2, N.A. Yakymchuk1,2, I.N. Korchagin3, D.N. Bozhezha2 1Institute of Applied Problems of Ecology, Geophysics and Geochemistry, 1 Laboratorny lane, Kyiv 01133, Ukraine 2Management and Marketing Center of Institute of Geological Science NAS Ukraine, 1 Laboratorny lane, Kyiv 01133, Ukraine 3Institute of Geophysics of Ukraine National Academy of Science, 32 Palladin Ave., Kyiv 03680, Ukraine, e-mail: korchagin@karbon.com.ua Purpose. The purpose of the paper is to study the possibility of using the direct FSPEF and VERS geoelectric methods and technology of frequency-resonance processing of remote sensing data for the operative assessment of the petroleum potential of individual structures and exploratory blocks in order to select the optimal sites for exploratory well drilling. Applying these mobile methods, we surveyed prospecting areas and blocks, as well as some hydrocarbon deposits in Ukraine, Kazakhstan, England, and on the offshore of South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago were. Within the surveyed area the wells were drilled. Design/methodology/approach. Experimental studies were conducted with the mobile technology of remote sensing data frequency-resonance processing and interpretation and geoelectric methods of forming the short-pulsed electromagnetic field (FSPEF) and vertical electric-resonance sounding (VERS). These techniques are “direct” methods for oil and gas prospecting and they work in the “substantial” paradigm of geophysical research. Technologies and techniques developed on the principles of this paradigm are directed for a particular (desired in each case) substance searching – oil, gas condensate, gold, zinc, uranium, etc. Findings. Results of monitoring for the wells drilling for gas in tight sands (DDB) have shown that the Belyaevskaya-400 well was not drilled to productive horizons, and the Novomechebilovskaya-100 well is located at the edge of the mapped anomalous zone.  Commercial gas inflows were not obtained in these wells. Research on the Zahatsor area demonstrated that theprojected wells are located in non-optimal locations. The drilling results confirm the prediction. Three dry wells on the Trinidad and Tobago offshore do not fall into the contours of the mapped anomalies. The projected well on the gas field (offshore South Africa) was moved into the contour of the nearest detected anomaly. The drilled productive well in the south of England falls into the contours of one anomaly, mapped on the search area, and two dry wells are located in the anomaly-free zone. The results of processing of satellite image of Obolonskaya structure were compared with the integrated model built on a complex of geological, geophysical and geochemical data. Practical value/implications. Anomalous zones discovered by direct prospecting methods can be considered as projections into the surface of hydrocarbon accumulations contours in the cross-section. This information can be used for an approximate estimate of hydrocarbon resources within the surveyed areas and structures. The results of these studies indicate the feasibility of applying direct prospecting technologies application to determine the optimum sites for exploratory wells drilling. The two-fold increase of success of well drilling could in general terms result in a significant acceleration and optimization of the prospecting process for oil and gas. Keywords: mobile technology, anomaly of deposit type, oil, gas, gas condensate, offshore, fault zone, satellite data, direct prospecting, processing of remote sensing data, interpretation. The full text of papers    References: Atlas rodovyshch nafty i hazu Ukrayiny. Skhidnyy naftohazonosnyy rehion [Atlas of oil and gas in Ukraine. Eastern oil and gas region]. Lviv, 1998, vol. 2, pp. 504-923. Bagdasarova M.V. Degazacija Zemli – global’nyj process, formirujushhij fljuidogennye poleznye iskopaemye (v tom chisle mestorozhdenija nefti i gaza) [Degassing of the Earth – a global process of fluidogene minerals forming (oil and gas including). 3-e Kudryavtsevskie chteniya. Vserossiyskaya konferentsiya po glubinnomu genezisu nefti. Moskva, 20-23 oktyabrya 2014 g. Moscow: TsGE, 2014, 22 p. Available at: URL: http://conference.deepoil.ru/images/stories/docs/3KR/3KR_Theses/Bagdasarova_Theses.pdf (Accessed 15 June 2015). Bagriy I.D. Obosnovanie novoj poiskovoj tehnologii i ee adaptacija na tradicionnyh i netradicionnyh neftegazonosnyh ob’ektakh impaktnyh struktur Ukrainy [Justification of the new search technology and its adaptation to the conventional and unconventional oil and gas objects of impact structures in Ukraine]. Geological journal, 2015, no. 2, pp. 105-126. Valyaev B.M. Priroda i osobennosti prostranstvennogo rasprostranenija netradicionnyh resursov uglevodorodov i ih skoplenij [Nature and characteristics of the spatial distribution of unconventional hydrocarbon resources and their accumulations]. Gazovaya promyshlennost’. Netraditsionnye resursy nefti i gaza. Spetsvypusk, 2012, pp. 9-16. Gluhmanchuk E.D., Krupizkyi V.V., Leontyevskyi A.V. Treshhinno-blokovaja struktura mestorozhdenij kak osnovnaja prichina nizkoj jeffektivnosti geologo-gidrodinamicheskih modelej [Fracture-block structure of deposits as the main reason of low efficiency of geological and hydrodynamic models]. Nedropol’zovanie – XXI vek, 2014, no. 3, pp. 64-67. Goshovsky S.V., Rosliy I.S. Aktualnist dorozvidky brakhiantyklinalnykh struktur pivdenno-skhidnoi chastyny Dniprovsko-Donetskoho avlakohenu. Stattia 2. Epihenetychna zonalnist i perspektyvni napriamy dorozvidky Novomechebylivskoi skladky [Urgency of additional exploration of brahiantyklinal structures of southeastern part of the Dnieper-Donetsk avlakogene. Article 2. Epigenetic zoning and future directions of additional exploration of Novomechebylivskaya fold]. Mineralni resursy Ukrainy, 2012, no. 4, pp. 32-39. Dudnikov M. Perspektyvy naftohazonosnosti pivdenno-skhidnoi chastyny Dniprovsko-Donetskoi zapadyny [Prospects for oil and gas of south-eastern Dnieper-Donets basin]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Heolohiia, 2012, issue 58, pp. 36-40. Zapivalov N.P. Geologicheskie i jekologicheskie riski v razvedke i dobyche nefti [Geological and ecological risks in exploration and production of oil]. Georesources, 2013, no. 3, pp. 3-5. Informacija o rezul’tatah geologorazvedochnyh rabot za 2014 g. po OISMSB [Information on the results of exploration work for 2014 at OISMSB]. Available at: http://www.wkn.geology.gov.kz/ru/napravlene/monitoring-mineralno-syrevoj-bazy-nedropolzovaniya (Accessed 15 June 2015). Karpov V.A. Sostojanie i perspektivy razvitija neftegazopoiskovyh rabot v Zapadnoj Sibiri [Status and prospects of oil and gas exploration in Western Siberia]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2012, no. 3, pp. 2-6. Kovalev N.I., Goh V.A., Ivashchenko P.N., Soldatova S.V. Opyt prakticheskogo ispol’zovaniya apparatury kompleksa “Poisk” po opredeleniyu granits neftegazonosnykh uchastkov i vybora tochek pod burenie skvazhin [Practical experience in using remote control equipment “Search” on oil and gas areas limit test and selecting of drilling wells locations]. Geoinformatika, 2010, no4, pp. 46-51. Krayushkin V.A. Mestorozhdenija nefti i gaza glubinnogo genezisa [Oil and gas fields of deep genesis]. […]