{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"\u0421\u0430\u0439\u0442 \u0436\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0443 \u00ab\u0413\u0435\u043e\u0456\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430\u00bb","provider_url":"http:\/\/www.geology.com.ua\/en","author_name":"\u0410\u0434\u043c\u0456\u043d\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440","author_url":"http:\/\/www.geology.com.ua\/en\/blog\/author\/andriy\/","title":"Geoinformatika 2016; 1(57) : 5-21 - \u0421\u0430\u0439\u0442 \u0436\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0443 \u00ab\u0413\u0435\u043e\u0456\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430\u00bb","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"J0xOgKhGrp\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.geology.com.ua\/en\/geoinformatika-2016-157-5-21\/\">Geoinformatika 2016; 1(57) : 5-21<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"http:\/\/www.geology.com.ua\/en\/geoinformatika-2016-157-5-21\/embed\/#?secret=J0xOgKhGrp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Geoinformatika 2016; 1(57) : 5-21&#8221; &#8212; \u0421\u0430\u0439\u0442 \u0436\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0443 \u00ab\u0413\u0435\u043e\u0456\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430\u00bb\" data-secret=\"J0xOgKhGrp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=http:\/\/www.geology.com.ua\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Geoinformatika 2016; 1(57) :\u00a05-21 (in Russian) RESULTS OF HYDROKARBON POTENTIAL ESTIMATION OF IMPACT STRUCTUREs AREAs LOCATION BY FREQUENCY-RESONANCE METHODS OF REMOTE SENSING DATA PROCESSING S.P. Levashov1,2, N.A. Yakymchuk1,2, I.N. Korchagin3, D.N. Bozhezha2, V.V. Prylukov2 1Institute of Applied Problems of Ecology, Geophysics and Geochemistry, 1 Laboratorny Lane, Kyiv 01133, Ukraine 2Management and Marketing Center of the Institute of Geological Science, NAS of Ukraine, 1 Laboratorny Lane, Kyiv 01133, Ukraine 3Institute of Geophysics, NAS of Ukraine, 32 Palladin Ave., Kyiv 03680, Ukraine, e-mail: korchagin@karbon.com.ua Purpose. The purpose of the paper is to evaluate hydrocarbon potential of the areas of large Siljan impact crater location in Sweden, the local exploration block within it, and two small structures in the United States; to select the optimal sites within the surveyed areas for exploration wells laying, to study the possibility of using direct-prospecting remote methods to detect meteorite fragments location; to develop and improve the techniques of geophysical direct-prospecting methods and technologies application during oil and gas prospecting and exploration in the reservoirs of conventional and unconventional types. Design\/methodology\/approach. Experimental studies were conducted using the mobile direct-prospecting technology of remote sensing (RS) data frequency-resonance processing and interpretation, which operates within the \u201cmatter\u201d Paradigm of Geophysical Research. The method of an operative assessment of the fluid pressure maximum values in the reservoirs is an important component of this technology. In the course of the investigations, this method was improved by adding the ability of the reservoir pressure assessment in various intervals of cross-section, included depths). Findings. In the area of the Siljan crater location we discovered and mapped 16 anomalous zones of the \u201cgas\u201d, \u201coil\u00a0+\u00a0gas\u201d, \u201cgas\u00a0+\u00a0water\u201d type and 6 anomalies of the \u201cgas\u201d and \u201cgas\u00a0+\u00a0water\u201d type within the local area. Values of fluid pressure in reservoirs vary within anomalies, ranging from 2,2 to 8,0 MPa. According to the scanning data, one gas-saturated horizon and four horizons with water and gas were located at the top of the cross-section. Using the technique of the reservoir pressure assessing at different intervals of the section within the \u201cGas\u201d anomalous zone, the following additional intervals for searching were identified: 1) 420\u2013500 m, H = 80 m; 2) 1120\u20131150 m, H = 30 m; 3) 2880\u20133140 m, H = 260 m; 4) 5185\u20135195 m, H = 100 m. The drilled wells in the Siljan crater (Gravberg-1 and Stenberg-1 deep wells included) does not fall within the contours of the detected anomalies. In the area of the Panther Mountain crater location (USA), six anomalous zones of the \u201creservoir of gas\u201d type were found. In the anomalous zone \u201cGas-1\u201d, three intervals of possible accumulation of gas were identified \u2013 two intervals in the anomalous zone \u201cGas-2\u201d and one interval in other four anomalies. In the \u201cBig Basin\u201d search area (USA), five anomalous zones of the \u201coil\u00a0+\u00a0gas\u201d type and four anomalous zones of the \u201cgas\u201d type were mapped. Within the anomalies contours, two intervals promising for oil and gas accumulations detection were found. The observed anomalies should be considered as priority local areas for detailed study by geophysical methods and drilling. In effect, these are \u201cSweet spots\u201d zones. Practical value\/implications. The results of the studies indicate the presence, within impact structures, of local areas and zones promising for the commercial hydrocarbon accumulation. The use of mobile and operative methods of \u201cdirect\u201d prospecting for hydrocarbon accumulations in the areas of various type of reservoir (collectors) and structure spreading could significantly improve the success rate of drilling (i.e. an increase in the number of wells with commercial hydrocarbon inflows). The improved method of fluid pressure in reservoir estimation at different levels of the cross-section can be widely used for the operative assessment of hydrocarbon potential of the cross-section deep horizons. The presence of a significant number of anomalous zones of the \u201coil and gas deposit\u201d type (in crystalline rocks at depth included) within the Siljan crater located on the Baltic Shield can be regarded as additional evidence in favor of the abiogenic origin of hydrocarbons. Keywords: Siljan crater, oil, gas, well, satellite data, direct prospecting, mobile technology, anomaly of deposit type, collector, remote sensing data processing, interpretation. \u00a0The full text of papers\u00a0 References Bagdasarova M.V. Degassing of the Earth &#8211; a global process of fluidogene minerals forming (oil and gas including). Glubinnaja neft\u2019 (RUS), 2014, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 1621-1644. Available at: http:\/\/journal.deepoil.ru\/images\/stories\/docs\/DO-2-10-2014\/5_Bagdasarova_2-10-2014.pdf (Accessed 5 January 2016) (in Russian). Bagriy I.D. Justification of the new search technology and its adaptation to the conventional and unconventional oil and gas objects of impact structures in Ukraine. Geological journal, 2015, no. 2, pp. 105-126 (in Russian). Valyaev B.M. Nature and characteristics of the spatial distribution of unconventional hydrocarbon resources and their accumulations. Gazovaja promyshlennost\u2019. Netradicionnye resursy nefti i gaza, Spetsvypusk , 2012, pp. 9-16 (in Russian). Gluhmanchuk E.D., Krupizkyi V.V., Leontyevskyi A.V. Fracture-block structure of deposits as the main reason of low\u00a0 efficiency of geological and hydrodynamic models. Nedropol\u2019zovanie XXI vek, 2014, no. 3, pp. 64-67 (in Russian). Zapivalov N.P. Geological and environmental risks in the oil exploration and production. Georesursy, 2013, no. 3, pp. 3-5 (inRussian). Krayushkin V.A. Mestorozhdenija nefti i gaza glubinnogo genezisa. Zhurnal Vsesoyuznogo khimicheskogo obshchestva im.D.I.\u00a0Mendeleeva, 1986, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 581-586 (in Russian). Kusov B.R. Genezis nekotorykh uglerodsoderzhashchikh poleznykh iskopaemykh (Ot metana do almaza): monografiya. Vladikavkaz, IPO SOIGSI, 2011, 195 p. (in Russian). Levashov S.P., Yakymchuk M.A. Korchagin I.N. Electroresonance sounding and its application for the ecology and engineer geology problem solving. Geological journal, 2003, no. 4, pp. 24-28 (in Russian). Levashov S.P., Yakymchuk N.A., Korchagin I.N. Express technology of \u201cdirect\u201d prospecting and exploration for hydrocarbon accumulations by geoelectric methods: results of practical application in 2001-2005. Geoinformatika, 2006, no. 1, pp. 31-43 (in Russian). Levashov S.P., Yakymchuk N.A., Korchagin I.N. New possibilities for the oil-and-gas prospects operative estimation of exploratory areas, difficult of access and remote territories, license blocks. Geoinformatika, 2010, no. 3, pp. 22-43 (in Russian). Levashov S.P., Yakymchuk N.A., Korchagin I.N. Assessment of relative values of reservoir pressure of fluids in collectors: results of conducted experiments and prospects of practical [&hellip;]"}