Телефон: 522-81-45

Geoinformatika 2017; 1(61) : 51-62 (in Russian) 

EXCESS MOISTENING AS A FACTOR OF LANDSLIDE ACTIVATION ON THE SLOPES OF THE KIEV WATER RESERVOIR

E.D. Kuzmenko1, A.P. Nikitash2, E.A. Yakovlev3, Yu.V. Heruk1

1Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, 15, Carpathian Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019, Ukraine, e-mail: kuzmenko-eduard@rambler.ru
2State company “Ukrainian Geological Company”, 10, Geofizikov Lane, Kyiv, 02000, Ukraine, e-mail: centrgidro@mail.ru
3Institute of Telecommunications and Global Information Space, 13, Chokolovsky Boulevard, Kyiv, 03186, Ukraine,e-mail: yakovlev@niss.gov.ua

Purpose. The aim of the research is to study the moistening of subsurface soils under intensive technogenic load of the territory with further distribution of priority tasks such as comparative assessment of the amount of natural and technogenic surface water, balance assessment of transit and infiltration water; selection of natural and technogenic components in the infiltration.The object of the study is the territory of the tract Mezhigorie on the right bank of the Kiev hydroelectric station water reservoir. The authors used detailed geological characteristics of the territory, regime measurements of groundwater levels, graphics of irrigation area and leakage from water bodies, information about the number of natural rainfall as initial data.
Design/methodology/approach. Calculation of infiltration and its division into natural and technogenic components are made taking into account methods created by N. Bindeman, V. Anpilov and elaborations made by authors based on observations of groundwater level regime on monitoring wells and comparative characteristics of their regime in the high water (spring and summer) and low water (summer-autumn) periods.
Findings. During investigations, the authors reduced the technogenic component of subsurface water to units that are comparable with the amount of rainfall. As a result, we have the opportunity to use quantitative assessment of the balance of the natural and technogenic components of rainfall and surface waters as a basis for calculating the infiltration. The authors estimated the ratio of natural and technogenic water that is equal to one to two. All components of infiltration were quantified and authors proved more than a threefold increase of infiltration into the aquifer at the expense of amount of technogenic waters, followed by unloading the aquifer on the slope of the water reservoir.
Practical value/implications. Slope stability calculations for predominant area of the territory of landslide studies on the observation platform allowed us to estimate the risk of landslides in quantitative calculation. With these estimates of excess moistening and full water flooding of separate engineering and geological elements the value of stability coefficient decreases in comparison with the natural regime for determined slipping plane from 1.7 to 0.9.Consequently, infiltration technogenic load is the main cause of landslides and thus activation of landslide in recent years.

Keywords: rainfall, natural and technogenic components of infiltration, landslides.

The full text of papers

  • References:

    1. Bespalova O.M. Dynamika zsuvnoho protsesu Serednoho Prydniprovia naprykladi dilianky Trypillia-Kaniv: avtoref. dys. kand. geol. nauk. Kyiv, Instytut geolohichnykh nauk, Natsionalna Akademiia Nauk Ukrainy, 2013, 24 p. [in Ukrainian].
    2. Bileush A. I. Opolzni i protivoopolznevye meropriyatiya. Kiev, Naukova dumka, 2009. 560 p.[in Russian].
    3. Borevskiy B.V., Drobnokhod N.I., Yazvin L.S. Otsenka zapasov podzemnykh vod. Kiev: Vyshcha shkola. Golovnoe izdatelstvo, 1989. 407 p. [in Russian].
    4. Hoshovskyi S.V., Rudko H.I., Blinov P.V. Inzhenerno-geolohichnyi analiz, monitorynh ta zakhyst terytorii vid zsuviv. Lviv: ZUKTs, Derzhavnyi komitet pryrodnykh resursiv Ukrainy, Instytut geolohichnykh nauk, Natsionalna Akademiia Nauk Ukrainy, 2004. 150 p. [in Ukrainian].
    5. Demchyshyn M.H. Tekhnohenni vplyvy na geolohichne seredovyshche terytorii Ukrainy. Kyiv, Hnozis, 2004. 156 p. [in Ukrainian].
    6. Klymchuk L.M., Blinov P.V., Velychko V.F., Prymushko S.I., Fesenko O.V., Shestopalov V.M. Suchasni inzhenerno-geolohichni umovy Ukrainy yak skladova bezpeky zhyttiediialnosti. Kyiv, 2008. 265 p. [in Ukrainian].
    7. Kuzmenko E.D., Bezsmertnyi A.F., Vdovyna O.P., Kryviuk I.V., Cheban V.D., Shtohryn L.V. Doslidzhennia zsuvnykh protsesiv geofizychnymy metodamy. Ivano-Frankivsk: IFNTUNH, 2009. 294p. [in Ukrainian].
    8. Kuzmenko E.D., Zhuravel O.M., Chepurna T.B., Chepurnyi I.V., Shtohryn L.V. Forecasting of exogenous geological processes. Part 1. Theoretical backgrounds of Forecasting. Principles of Landslides activation Geoinformatika, 2011, no. 3, pp. 61-74. [in Ukrainian].
    9. Kuzmenko E.D., Zhuravel O.M., Chepurna T.B., Chepurnyi I.V., Shtohryn L.V. Forecasting of exogenous geological processes. Part 2. Mechanism of development of the surface karts and mud flow processes. GIS of EGP prediction. Geoinformatika, 2011, no. 4, pp. 58-77. [in Ukrainian].
    10. Kuzmenko E.D., Chepurnyj I.V., Nikitash E.A., Shtogrin L.V. The long-termtemporal prediction of the land slides activity in the right bank of Kiev reservoir. Geodynamika,2012, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 93-102 [in Ukrainian].
    11. Kuzmenko E.D., Kryzhanivskiy E.I., Karpenko A.N., Zhuravel A.M. Zakonomernaya svyaz mezhdu velichinami veroyatnostey vozniknoveniya opolzney i opolznevoy opasnosti pri kompleksnom vozdeystvii prirodno-tekhnogennykh faktorov. Nauchnoe otkrytie. Diplom No 310. Nauchnye otkrytiya: sbornik kratkikh opisaniy nauchnykh otkrytiy, nauchnykh idey, nauchnykh gipotez. 2006. Moscow, MAANOI, 2007, pp. 64-65. [in Russian].
    12. Natsionalna dopovid pro stan tekhnohennoi ta pryrodnoi bezpeky v Ukraini u 2014 rotsi. Kyiv, DP “Ahenstvo Chornobyl inform”, 2015. 365 p. [in Ukrainian].
    13. Nikitash O.P., Kondratiuk S.V., Fedorenko A.S. Zvit pro provedennia obstezhennia gruntiv z metoiu vyznachennia zakhodiv z likvidatsii eroziino-nebezpechnykh zon mista Kyieva. DP “Ukrainska geolohichna kompaniia”. Kyiv, 2013. 33 p. [in Ukrainian].
    14. Nikitash O.P., Rasovskyi V.M., Kondratiuk S.V., Sydorova N.M., Fedorenko A.S., Kormyla S.T., Kalenychuk-Porkhanova Zh.O. Stvorennia bazy danykh rozpovsiudzhennia ta rozvytku ekzohennykh geolohichnykh protsesiv i provedennia kompleksnoi obrobky materialiv z otsinkoiu dynamiky ta poperedzhennia naslidkiv vplyvu tsykh protsesiv na dovkillia m. Kyieva. Stvorennia problemno-oriientovanoho kompleksu kontroliu ta provedennia robit shchodo yoho kompiuternoho osnashchennia. PDRHP “Pivnichgeologiia”. Kyiv, 2003. 86 p. [in Ukrainian].
    15. Prykhodko V.V., Rudko H.I., Nikitash O.P., Rasovskyi V.M., Sydorova N.F., Kondratiuk S.V. Rozvytok nebezpechnykh zsuvnykh geolohichnykh protsesiv na terytorii Kyivskoi oblasti. Ekolohiia dovkillia ta bezpeka zhyttiediialnosti, 2005, no. 6, pp. 52-61. [in Ukrainian].
    16. Rudko G.I., Goshovskyi S.V. Ekolohichna bezpeka tekhnopryrodnykh geosystem (naukovi ta metodychni osnovy). Kyiv, ZAT “Nichlava”, 2006. 464 p. [in Ukrainian].
    17. Rudko G.I. Erysh I.F. Opolzni i drugie geodinamicheskie protsessy gornoskladchatykh oblastey Ukrainy (Krym, Karpaty). Kiev, Zadruga, 2006. 624 p. [in Russian].
    18. Rudko G.I., Osiyuk V.A. Inzhenernaya geodinamika Ukrainy i Moldovy (opolznevye geosistemy). Chernovtsy, Bukrek, 2012. Vol. 1. 592 p. [in Russian].
    19. Kyoji Sassa, Paolo Canuti, Yueping Yin. Landslide Science for a Safer Geoenvironment: Volume 1: The International Programme on Landslides (IPL). Bucher: Springer Link, Springer, 2014. 493 p.
    20. KyojiSassa, Paolo Canuti, Yueping Yin. Landslide Science for a Safer Geoenvironment: Volume 2: Methods of Landslide Studies. Bucher: Springer Link, Springer, 2014. 851 p.
    21. Kyoji Sassa, Paolo Canuti, Yueping Yin. Landslide Science for a Safer Geoenvironment: Volume 3: Targeted Landslides. Bucher: Springer Link, Springer, 2014. 717 p.
    22. Materials of proceedings 33rd International Geological Congress, 6-14th August 2008, Oslo, Norway,2008. CD-ROM.